top of page
Search

The Federal Maritime Commission introduced its newly established regionally based structure for the investigatory program during the Commission's meeting on May 3. The meeting covered various topics, including enforcement activity, updates on the implementation of the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022 (OSRA), and the current status of the Maritime Transportation Data Initiative (MTDI).

While enforcement activity was a focal point, discussions involving confidential information were held in a closed session and were not disclosed publicly.

The Bureau of Enforcement, Investigations, and Compliance (BEIC) reported robust enforcement activity, with 191 investigations, 204 enforcement matters, 59 compliance matters, and three formal enforcement proceedings conducted in Fiscal Year 2022. The majority of these actions were directed towards ocean carriers and marine terminal operators. The Commission's efforts have resulted in the collection of over $3 million in civil penalties since 2021.

During the meeting, a new regional organization for investigators was unveiled, aimed at enhancing their ability to address allegations of violations from the public and be in closer proximity to regulated entities. Investigators will be located in various regions, including Region One (New York/New Jersey, Chicago, Norfolk), Region Two (Atlanta, Charleston, Savannah, Miami, Houston), and Region Three (Los Angeles/Long Beach, Oakland, Seattle, Salt Lake City). The Bureau of Enforcement, Investigations, and Compliance will also be expanding its staff across all offices.

The Commission remains committed to successfully implementing the rulemakings mandated by OSRA. In March, a Final Rule was issued, amending the Commission's rules of practice and procedure regarding penalties and refunds to comply with OSRA Section 8. The changes align the regulations with the authority granted by OSRA to order refunds for charges paid under a Charge Complaint proceeding. Progress is being made on two ongoing rulemakings concerning Demurrage and Detention Billing Requirements and Unreasonable Refusal to Deal or Negotiate with Respect to Vessel Space. Additionally, work is being conducted on a rulemaking addressing Unfair or Unjustly Discriminatory Methods, which is expected to follow the Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Unreasonable Refusal to Deal.

Commissioner Carl Bentzel provided an overview of his involvement in the MTDI, which included holding meetings with various industry representatives and hosting a Data Summit in June 2022. Commissioner Bentzel issued a Final Report last month, outlining his findings and presenting recommendations for potential next steps.

FMC Appoints New BEIC Director

Early this month, FMC Chairman Daniel B. Maffei appointed John G. Crews, II, as the Director of the Bureau of Enforcement, Investigations, and Compliance (BEIC). In this role, he will supervise the Commission's enforcement program.

With extensive experience in law enforcement and justice administration, including serving as a U.S. Immigration Judge, Mr. Crews brings valuable expertise to his new position. Chairman Maffei expressed confidence in Mr. Crews' leadership and his role in achieving effective enforcement. Mr. Crews holds a Juris Doctor degree from Southern Methodist University and a Bachelor of Liberal Studies from Boston University, and he is a member of the State Bar of New Mexico.

Ocean carriers Ocean Network Express Ptd. Ltd. (ONE) and Wan Hai Lines, Ltd. recently settled allegations of misconduct brought by the Federal Maritime Commission's Bureau of Enforcement, Investigations, and Compliance, resulting in a combined total of $2.65 million in civil penalties.

ONE, in an agreement reached with the FMC in April, resolved allegations of violating 46 U.S.C. § 41102(c) by imposing detention charges when appointments were unavailable during allocated free time for equipment return. As part of the agreement, ONE agreed to pay a $1.7 million civil penalty. Notably, the agreement also introduced a significant new provision requiring ONE to provide restitution to affected shippers in the form of refunds and waivers. ONE also expressed its commitment to comply with the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022 and the Interpretative Rule on Detention and Demurrage.

Similarly, the Commission settled with Wan Hai Lines, Ltd. and Wan Hai Lines (USA) Ltd. to close an Order of Investigation and Hearing issued in December 2021. Wan Hai agreed to pay $950,000 in civil penalties for allegations of violating 46 U.S.C. § 41102(c) by failing to observe and enforce just and reasonable practices regarding charges related to empty container returns. Additionally, Wan Hai refunded all detention charges collected under the invoices in question and implemented corrective actions to prevent future violations and ensure compliance with the Commission's Interpretive Rule on Detention and Demurrage.

Federal Maritime Commission Chairman Daniel B. Maffei commended the Bureau of Enforcement, Investigations, and Compliance for their efforts, emphasizing that the agreements send a clear message to the international shipping community that ocean carriers must fully comply with U.S. legal obligations. The penalties imposed on ONE and Wan Hai serve as both a deterrent and relief for affected shippers.

It is worth noting that in June 2022, Hapag Lloyd AG paid $2 million in civil penalties to address allegations of violating 46 U.S.C. § 41102(c) in their assessment of detention charges.

It is important to differentiate between a compromise agreement, as seen with ONE, which is reached before the Commission initiates formal enforcement action, and a settlement agreement, as seen with Wan Hai, which concludes an ongoing enforcement proceeding. Neither ONE nor Wan Hai admitted to any violation of the law.

The civil penalties paid by the ocean carriers go directly to the General Fund of the U.S. Treasury, with no revenue being received by the Federal Maritime Commission in the process of assessing these penalties.

Inflation has pulled the maximum penalty for not knowing and willful violation of the Shipping Act of 1984, Commission regulation or order (46 U.S.C. 41107(a)) to $14,149 per occurrence, as of January 15, 2023.

If a person knowingly and willfully violates Shipping Act of 1984, or Commission regulation or order, then they could face a maximum civil penalty of up to $70,752 per occurrence.

The FMC is responsible for enforcing the Shipping Act and has the authority to investigate alleged violations and assess penalties for noncompliance. The FMC may take various enforcement actions, including the issuance of warning letters, formal orders, and civil penalties, to ensure compliance with the Shipping Act's requirements.

Violations of the Shipping Act can take many forms, including unfair practices, discriminatory treatment, and failure to adhere to regulatory reporting requirements. The FMC may investigate alleged violations and may bring an action against the alleged violator if it determines that a violation has occurred.

Experts at Atlantic Pacific Tariffs Inc. are always available for consultation regarding compliance issues, providing clients with up to 2 hours per month of free consultation services.

Prospective clients may also avail of a FREE 30-minute Zoom-based consultation (English and Spanish available). Email us today at info@aptariffs.com.

bottom of page